What Did Obama Do For Gun Control

Barack Obama — Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

law and order

The Real Reason Obama Didn't Pass Gun Control

Democrats had downplayed the outcome for years. If they're serious well-nigh changing things, that needs to terminate now.

Continue to article content

After every mass shooting, there'south a new ritual: sharing an old Twitter post from a British columnist that says: "In retrospect Sandy Hook marked the end of the US gun control fence. Once America decided killing children was endurable, it was over."

But "America" decided no such thing after the Dec 2012 simple school massacre in Newtown, Conn. Poll after poll in early 2013 showed a most-unanimous consensus of Americans supporting legislation to close all loopholes in the background bank check system, and smaller majorities bankroll bans on set on weapons and high-capacity magazines. A bipartisan background check beak, drafted past Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey, won the support of a Senate majority. It was defeated, 4 months after the tragedy, by a filibustering Senate minority.

America's gun control majority hasn't decided that the murder of children is a "endurable" toll for preserving our ramble freedoms. It only hasn't figured out how to overcome the intense opposition from the gun rights minority, in a system of regime designed to requite disproportionate power to lightly populated rural areas, where dear of gun rights runs deep, and intense minority opposition, a category that includes gun owners. Figuring it out is crucial for gun control advocates, and it requires a better agreement of why the gun control push button failed afterwards Sandy Hook.

One easy culprit is the Senate'southward filibuster rule. A background-bank check bill like Manchin-Toomey would likely pass without a filibuster—even red state Democrats similar Manchin and Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama support universal background checks. But anybody knows that a groundwork check nib isn't a panacea; several of the most contempo mass shooters were young men without criminal records who legally obtained their weapons.

More ambitious gun legislation remains a harder sell. Democrats put an assault weapons ban on the Senate floor in 2013, and information technology received only 40 votes, with several swing state Democrats who are still in the Senate—Colorado'south Michael Bennet, New Mexico'southward Martin Heinrich, Maine'southward Angus King (a nominal contained), Montana'southward Jon Tester and Virginia's Mark Warner—voting against information technology.

The main trouble gun control advocates had in 2013 was not the rules simply the lack of a mandate, the product of Democratic squeamishness nearly gun command going dorsum several years.

Many Democrats had been uncomfortable with gun control since the moment President Beak Clinton enacted the assault weapons ban in 1994, over the individual opposition of the Firm Democratic leadership. When Democrats were decimated in the 1994 midterm elections, including Speaker Tom Foley, gun control was blamed. (In his autobiography, Clinton wrote that the National Burglarize Association "could rightly claim to take fabricated [Newt] Gingrich the House speaker.")

So the 1999 Columbine school shooting rekindled Autonomous interest in gun command, and Vice President Al Gore cast a tie-breaking Senate vote to pass a mensurate requiring background checks for purchases at gun shows. But the Republican-led Firm teamed up with conservative Democrats, withal scarred by the 1994 backlash, to squelch information technology.

The gun result and then dogged Gore'southward 2000 presidential bid. Under pressure from his lone primary rival Sen. Nib Bradley, Gore endorsed a ban on cheap handguns, along with a photo-license requirement for purchasing other handguns. Gore futilely tried to downplay that opinion during the full general election, and some Democrats attributed his defeat to information technology. Shortly earlier Election Twenty-four hour period 2004, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry awkwardly tried to leaven his support for renewing the assault weapons ban, which Republicans had merely let expire, by going goose hunting.

And so Barack Obama released an blessing statement during the 2008 presidential campaign when the Supreme Court declared that the 2nd Amendment enshrines an individual right to bear artillery, and proceeded to flip several states with meaning gun-owning constituencies. In his first term, Obama did not push for gun control measures after the fatal mass shootings at Fort Hood, Texas; an Aurora, Colorado, movie theatre; and the Tucson, Arizona supermarket that cutting short Rep. Gabby Giffords' congressional career. He continued to keep quiet on gun control in the 2012 presidential entrada as well.

The Sandy Hook massacre, which took place ane month subsequently the 2012 election, upended Obama'due south second-term legislative agenda. The national trauma resulting from the murders of 20 small children was and then profound that Obama reasonably ended this was not a time for circumspection and adding. In January 2013, Obama proposed a long listing of measures, including bans on attack weapons and armor-piercing bullets and a limit on the size of magazines.

And notwithstanding he began his gun control push from a position of political weakness. He had not campaigned on gun command, allow lone a specific gear up of gun control proposals. He couldn't influence lawmakers with clear evidence of blood-red- and purple-state voters who were dedicated to his proposals. No broad-based gun control motility was in place to apply grassroots pressure level.

Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association had cultivated for decades a movement of unmarried-issue voters, fostering a cultural identity around gun buying that fortifies its legal and constitutional arguments. We now know that the NRA leadership was internally conflicted about how to respond to the unique horror that was Sandy Claw, merely the ultimate conclusion to continue its unwavering defiance against whatever gun restrictions worked perfectly, and kept most Republicans (and a few Democrats) in line.

Today, gun command advocates are more optimistic because back up in polls for their ideas is strong, the NRA has been distracted by internal strife, and President Donald Trump has hinted that he could push button for a background-cheque bill or a reddish-flag bill. If Trump shocks the states all by challenging the NRA and breaking its back, he will have done the Democrats' job for them. But it remains very hard to fathom that Trump, along with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, would get behind any bill that draws the NRA'south vehement opposition. And any bill that had the NRA's approval would not be much of a beak.

The next serious opening for gun command legislation, then, will most likely be when Democrats get control of the White House and the Senate, withal narrowly. But to be better positioned than Obama was in 2013, Democrats take to run on gun control at present and run on it hard.

Some gun control advocates fence that Democrats have been running on the issue, noting that in the 2018 midterms, most of the candidates endorsed by Everytown and Giffords' pro-gun command political action committee won, and that 15 House Republicans with "A" ratings from the NRA were replaced by Democrats with "F" ratings.

All the same, information technology's all also easy for winning candidates to wrongly presume that nominally running on an upshot means you lot have won the public's commitment on it. In George Westward. Bush's victory lap after his 2004 reelection, he declared, "I earned capital in the entrada, political majuscule, and now I intend to spend it [on] Social Security and tax reform." And it's true that he had campaigned in part on a program to partially privatize Social Security. But he learned the hard manner that just because he said something on occasion on the campaign trail, that didn't mean the voters were paying close attending.

Once Bush began his second term with a concerted push for Social Security reform, Democrats mercilessly hammered the programme. Public polling for information technology was limp. Afterwards months of flailing and frittering away all that political capital, Bush shelved the plan.

The lesson is that Democrats have to not simply run on gun control, but as well go far fundamental to the 2020 ballot. That means campaigning on gun control non only in the firsthand aftermath of traumatic mass shootings, only on all the other days when gun violence is yet happening off our Goggle box screens.

Most of the approximately 36,000 annual gun deaths are not from mass shootings and not from assault-mode weapons. Near 22,000, slightly less than two-thirds, are suicides. Others result from domestic violence, routine crimes and accidents. Of the homicides, nearly two-thirds are from handguns, not armed forces-style assault rifles. These quieter deaths, unlike domestic terror incidents with high torso counts and flamboyant weaponry, happen every day. They must be talked about every twenty-four hour period if a movement fueled by a potent sense of urgency is to be built. Presidential candidates could begin every stump spoken language with a recounting of the gun deaths that happened in the past week, to bulldoze home the signal that every day without activity is a day when someone needlessly dies.

Such a strategy is non without significant political risk. At that place is a reason why Obama did not try to build a robust gun control mandate in 2008 and 2012: He probably would have lost critical swing states similar Ohio, Iowa and Colorado.

And information technology'due south 1 thing to run on universal background checks, which take almost universal political appeal but limited policy touch. It's some other to run on more ambitious all the same more than controversial proposals like federal licensing, mandatory buybacks and ammunition limits. The co-chair of Iowa's Des Moines County Democrats recently told Political leader that some of those proposals, which take been embraced past several candidates in the electric current presidential field, amounted to "crazy talk" since "there's a pretty heavy gun culture out here in Iowa, even amid Democrats."

But if Democrats are serious well-nigh enacting gun control, then they volition have to show that seriousness now. Otherwise, this time won't be dissimilar, and the next time won't exist different, and gun control fence really will exist over.